タビスタ | まったく新しいオンライン英会話
[B+] The Language of Lying

LET'S UNLOCK WORDS AND PHRASES 🔐

allegation

[ al-i-ˈgey-shuhn ]

noun

- a statement, made without giving proof, that someone has done something wrong or illegal

She declared that the allegation was a lie.

spur

[ spur ]

verb

 - to cause or lead to something happening

The coach's speech spurred the team to work harder and win the game.

convoluted 

[ ˈkon-vuh-loo-tid ]

adjective

- complicated and difficult to follow

The instructions were so convoluted that I had trouble understanding what to do next.

admissible 

[ ad-ˈmis-uh-buhl ]

adjective 

- considered satisfactory and acceptable in a law court

The judge ruled that new evidence was admissible.

electroencephalogram

[ ih-lek-troh-en-ˈsef-uh-luh-gram ]

noun

- (EEG) refers to a machine that measures brain activity by recording electrical signals from the brain

The doctors used an electroencephalogram to monitor the patient's brain activity during the test.

LET'S TAKE A LOOK! [ FULL CLIP ]

What is the video all about? Choose two statements that refer to the main ideas of the video.

1. All methods of lie detection, including polygraphs and voice-stress analyzers, are reliable enough to be used as evidence in court.

2. Linguistic text analysis can identify patterns in language use that may indicate deception.

3. Liars tend to use more negative language because they feel guilty on a subconscious level.

4. Liars typically use more personal pronouns when making deceptive statements to emphasize their involvement in the situation.

LET'S TRY IT! - FIRST CUT

A. Script Completion

Direction: Watch the first cut of the video and complete the following lines below with the missing words or phrases. Write or type down your answers while listening.

⏱ 00:08 - 01:45

"Sorry, my phone died." "It's nothing. I'm fine." "These allegations are completely unfounded." "The company was not aware of (1) " "I love you." We hear anywhere from 10 to 200 lies a day, and we spent much of our history coming up with ways to detect them, (2) to polygraphs, blood-pressure and breathing monitors, voice-stress analyzers, eye trackers, infrared brain scanners, and even the 400-pound electroencephalogram. But although such tools have worked (3) , most can be fooled with enough preparation, and none are considered reliable enough to even be admissible in court. But, what if the problem is not with the techniques, but the (4) that lying spurs physiological changes? What if we took a more direct approach, using communication science to analyze the lies themselves? On a psychological level, we lie partly to paint a better picture of ourselves, (5) to the person we wish we were rather than the person we are. But while our brain is busy dreaming, it's letting (6) . Our conscious mind only controls about 5% of our cognitive function, including communication, while the other 95% occurs (7) , and according to the literature on reality monitoring, stories based on imagined experiences are qualitatively different from those based on real experiences. This suggests that creating a false story about a personal topic takes work and results in a different (8)

LET'S PRACTICE - SECOND CUT

B. Script Completion

Direction: Watch the second cut of the video and complete the following lines below with the missing phrases.

⏱ 01:45 - 04:12

A technology known as linguistic text analysis has helped to identify four such common patterns in the subconscious (1) . First, liars reference themselves less, when making deceptive statements. They write or talk more about others, often using the third person to (2) themselves from their lie, which sounds more false: "Absolutely no party took place at this house," or "I didn't host a party here." Second, liars tend to be more negative, because on a subconscious level, they feel guilty about lying. For example, a liar might say something like, "Sorry, my stupid phone battery died. I hate that thing." Third, liars typically explain events in (3) since our brains struggle to build a complex lie. Judgment and evaluation are complex things for our brains to compute. As a U.S. President once famously insisted: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." And finally, even though liars keep descriptions simple, they tend to use longer and more (4) , inserting unnecessary words and irrelevant but factual sounding details in order to pad the lie. Another President confronted with a scandal proclaimed: "I can say, categorically, that this investigation indicates that no one on the White House staff, no one in this administration presently employed was involved in this very bizarre incident." Let's apply (5) to some famous examples. Take seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong. When comparing a 2005 interview, in which he had denied taking performance-enhancing drugs to a 2013 interview, in which he admitted it, his use of personal pronouns increased by nearly 3/4. Note the contrast between the following two quotes. First: "Okay, you know, a guy in a French, in a Parisian laboratory (6) , you know, Jean-Francis so-and-so, and he tests it. And then you get a phone call from a newspaper that says: 'We found you to be positive six times for EPO." Second: "I lost myself in all of that. I'm sure there would be other people that couldn't handle it, but I (7) it, and I was used to controlling everything in my life. I controlled every outcome in my life." In his denial, Armstrong described a hypothetical situation focused on someone else, removing himself from the situation entirely. In his admission, he owns his statements, delving into his (8) . But the use of personal pronouns is just one indicator of deception.

LET'S DO THE CHALLENGE - FULL CLIP

Direction: Answer the following questions based on the video and let's check your comprehension.

⏱ 00:08 - 04:12

  1. What is the main assumption behind traditional methods of lie detection?

  2. What percentage of our cognitive function, including communication, is controlled by the conscious mind?

  3. According to the passage, how do liars typically reference themselves in deceptive statements?

  4. Why do liars tend to be more negative in their statements?

  5. What change in language did Lance Armstrong exhibit between his denial and admission regarding performance-enhancing drugs?