タビスタ | まったく新しいオンライン英会話
[A] Mariana Mazzucato | Economic Value [ FULL ]

LET'S SHADOW MARIANA MAZZUCATO IN FULL!


Between 2007 and 2010, / 8.8 million people lost their jobs. // The bank also had to then be bailed out / by the US taxpayer / for the sum of 10 billion dollars. // We didn't hear the taxpayers bragging / that they were value creators, / but obviously, / having bailed out one of the biggest value-creating productive companies, / perhaps they should have. // What I want to do next is / kind of ask ourselves how we lost our way, / how it could be, actually, / that a statement like that could almost go unnoticed, / because it wasn't an after-dinner joke; / it was said very seriously. // So what I want to do is / bring you back 300 years in economic thinking, / when, actually, / the term was contested. // It doesn't mean that they were right or wrong, / but you couldn't just call yourself a value creator, / a wealth creator. // There was a lot of debate / within the economics profession. // And what I want to argue is, / we've kind of lost our way, / and that has actually allowed this term, "wealth creation" and "value," / to become quite weak and lazy / and also easily captured. // OK? // So let's start -- I hate to break it to you -- / 300 years ago. // Now, what was interesting 300 years ago is / the society was still an agricultural type of society. // So it's not surprising / that the economists of the time, / who were called the Physiocrats, / actually put the center of their attention to farm labor. // When they said, "Where does value come from?" / they looked at farming. // And they produced what I think was probably / the world's first spreadsheet, / called the "Tableau Économique," / and this was done by François Quesnay, / one of the leaders of this movement. // And it was very interesting, / because they didn't just say, "Farming is the source of value." // They then really worried about / what was happening to that value / when it was produced. // What the Tableau Économique does -- and I've tried to make it a bit simpler here for you -- / is it broke down the classes in society into three. // The farmers, creating value, / were called the "productive class." // Then others who were just moving some of this value around, / but it was useful, / it was necessary, / these were the merchants; / they were called the "proprietors." // And then there was another class / that was simply charging the farmers a fee for an existing asset, / the land, / and they called them the "sterile class." // Now, this is a really heavy-hitting word / if you think what it means: / that if too much of the resources are going to the landlords, / you're actually putting the reproduction potential of the system at risk. // And so all these little arrows there / were their way of simulating -- / again, spreadsheets and simulators, / these guys were really using big data -- / they were simulating what would actually happen under different scenarios / if the wealth actually wasn't reinvested back into production / to make that land more productive / and was actually being siphoned out in different ways, / or even if the proprietors were getting too much.

LET'S UNDERSTAND!

Let-s-Understand Shadowing-for-Business Inside-Banner

  1. Between 2007 and 2010, how much money did US taxpayers contribute to bail out the bank?

  2. What does Mariana Mazzucato argue has happened to the term "wealth creation" over time?

  3. Who were the Physiocrats, and what did they focus their attention on 300 years ago?

  4. Do you agree with Mariana Mazzucato’s argument that the term "wealth creation" has become weak and lazy? Why or why not?

  5. How do you think the ideas of the Physiocrats about value creation would apply to modern industries like technology or finance?