タビスタ | まったく新しいオンライン英会話
[B+] The Rise of AI Armies

LET'S UNLOCK WORDS AND PHRASES 🔐

conjure

[ 'kon-jer ]

verb

- to make something appear by magic, or as if by magic

She could conjure memories of her childhood with a simple melody.

autonomous

[ aw-'ton-uh-muhs ]

adjective

- independent and having the power to make your own decisions

The autonomous vehicle smoothly navigated through traffic.

ostensibly

[ aa-'sten-suh-blee ]

adverb

- in a way that appears or claims to be one thing when it is really something else

Ostensibly, the company's new policy aimed to promote teamwork, but many employees saw it as a way to increase surveillance.

amoral

[ ey-'mawr-uhl ]

adjective

- without moral principles

The AI's decisions were amoral, based solely on data and algorithms.

despot

[ 'des-puht ]

noun

- a ruler who has unlimited power and often uses it unfairly and cruelly

The despot ruled with fear, suppressing any opposition to his power.

LET'S READ! 📖

Direction: Read the passage aloud. Then, read it silently.


The idea of killer robots usually conjures images from science fiction films like Terminator and Robocop, but lethal autonomous weapons have not only been developed but are currently in use. A fixed-position sentry gun, developed by Samsung for the South Korean government, can perform surveillance and is reportedly capable of firing autonomously, and it is not alone. The UK is developing a drone destined to replace human-piloted warplanes, which will not only carry air-to-air and air-to-ground weaponry and operate intercontinentally but will also incorporate full autonomy. Other countries including Russia and the U.S., are developing autonomous weapons including tanks, warships, submarines, and humanoid robots.


Two systems in particular, under development by the U.S. government, have led academics to warn that they could leave humans completely defenseless. The U.S. Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is aiming to create Academics like Stuart Russell, Professor of Computer Science at the University of California, Berkeley, argue that such research could breach Geneva conventions and could lead to an apocalyptic scenario where humanity is in that hands of amoral machines. The pace in which the technology is advancing means that ostensibly, self-aware, highly-armed machines, could be deployed in battle within years rather than decades, which has greatly increased the level of concern.


Even those at the forefront of robotics technology and artificial intelligence (AI), including founders of AI and robotics companies and Silicon Valley executives have been pushing the United Nations to ban the further development and use of autonomous weapons. The reason behind the call to prohibit such weapons is to stop the current arms race for killer robots and prevent it from from going any further. In a letter to the United Nations, signed by over a hundred specialists from twenty-six countries, it is argued that such an arms race could bring about the "third revolution in warfare," following the development and the use of gunpowder and nuclear arms. This arms race could be unlike anything we have seen in the past, as lethal autonomous weapons could allow for armed conflicts on scales scarcely imaginable.


Another major concern is the removal of the human factor and, by extension, the moral factor. A machine that is simply programmed to locate and destroy a target is able to do so regardless of what the target is. This raises the terrifying possibility of innocent populations being targeted by terrorists and despots. It is the moral element which has prompted the call for lethal autonomous weapons systems to be added to the list of weapons banned under the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) along with chemical and other weapons.


On top of this, there is, as with all computer-controlled machines, the added risk of malfunction and hacking. It is for these and other reasons that the call to pursue AI for peace, rather than further industrializing war, is growing increasingly louder.

COMPREHENSION CHECK 🧠 A. Direction: Identify if the statements are TRUE of FALSE. If the statement is FALSE, provide the correct answer.


COMPREHENSION CHECK

  1. Even those at the forefront of robotics technology and artificial intelligence have been pushing the United Nations to ban the further development and use of autonomous weapons.

  2. Another major concern is the removal of the artificial intelligence factor and, by extension, the mortal factor.

  3. The idea of killer robots usually conjures images from science fiction films, but lethal autonomous weapons have not only been derived but are currently in production.

  4. The South Korean sentry gun is capable of performing resistance and firing anonymously.

  5. The pace in which the technology is advancing means that ostensibly, self-aware, highly-armed machines, could be disposed in battle within decades, which has greatly increased the level of concern.

B. Direction: Answer the following questions based on the article.

  1. What is the concern expressed by founders of AI and robotics companies to the United Nations?

  2. What do specialists from twenty-six countries argue for the prohibition of lethal autonomous weapons?

  3. Why is there a call for lethal autonomous weapons systems to be added to the list of weapons banned under the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW)?

  4. What examples of lethal autonomous weapons are provided in the article?

  5. What is the growing call mentioned in the article regarding the AI warfare and what's the reason behind it?

C. Direction: Match the words in column A with their synonyms in column B.

AB

1. lethal

A. infringe

2. autonomous

B. forbid

3. breach

C. vigilance

4. prohibit

D. fatal

5. surveillance

E. self-governing